- Wearing second hand clothes instead of new clothes is better for the environment. It’s recycling.
- Vintage clothes are generally better made than mass produced clothes today.
- Vintage clothes are generally unique.
- Vintage clothes are cheaper than their modern equivalents.
- Vintage clothes reflect a more desirable lifestyle than modern clothes.
- Vintage clothes reflect classic books and films and historical events and allow the wearer to feel a connection with the past.
c.1947 Broderie Anglaise Dress - Gingermegs Vintage, Shoes - Clarks, Belt - charity shop |
In the last few years, I’ve measured between 36-25-36 at my
slimmest and 38-27-37 at my largest. I generally always have an 11 inch
difference between my waist and bust and a 10 inch difference between my waist
and hips. A quick look at Topshop’s size guide shows a size 12 to be 36-29-38.
Pretty much every modern dress I try on is far too big on the waist and ends up
looking boxy. Jersey or stretch dresses to fit my waist are too tight elsewhere
to be comfortable. I’m also short waisted so the waist on most modern dresses
sits an inch or two lower than it should, increasing the boxiness and causing
gaping armholes on sleeveless dresses. Finally, I’m 5 ft 3 inches so I’d have
to take up the hems.
Dresses made in the 1940s, 1950s and 1960s with their clever
tailoring and hourglass proportions are a perfect fit. Almost every midcentury dress
I’ve found has at least a 9 inch difference between the waist and bust. I also find
dresses easier to find than skirt and top combinations from this era. While
1930s dresses would also fit, these are longer and rarer so less practical for
everyday wear.
One of only three 1950s skirts I own. This one was from a charity shop. |
Why not wear separates? True, I can wear modern skirts provided
they are flared from the waist. Finding tops, particularly ones which match an
existing skirt is hard. Shirts are out of the question for the same reason as modern
dresses. Blouses and t shirts which fit at the front gape hugely at the back
even when tucked in.
Why not just belt at the waist? Trying to remove 5-6 inches of fabric by belting requires a wide belt which doesn't always suit the dress. It doesn't solve gaping at the back or too-wide shoulders. The dress can also puff out around the belt in an unflattering way.
Even vintage shoes, narrower and with longer toe space fit
me better than their modern equivalents. If I want modern gloves, I have to buy
them from the children’s section but I have four pairs of leather 1950s gloves
which fit perfectly.
Of course, there’s lovely vintage reproduction clothing out
there by the likes of Collectif and Vivien of Holloway in modern sizing but it's not for me.
The Weather:
I walk everywhere totalling 30-40 miles a week. On the
coldest days, I wear my 1950s dresses with wool tights, boots, cardigan or
jumper and coat. I own three petticoats – the heaviest keeps me warm even when
it’s below freezing, the lightest I sewed myself and gives shape to the skirts
with only a two layers of tulle for the hottest days. I also never have the
issue of water creeping up my jeans after it’s rained; the tightly woven cotton
of most of my 1950s dresses deflects light rain. While I own a lot of dresses, I wear them all year round.
Petticoat - made by me |
1950s Petticoat - Gingermegs Vintage |
Brilliant Colours and Prints:
Modern clothes seem to see bright colours and vivid patterns
as an exception. I see stripes, polka dots, large florals, tiny florals, Aztec prints
when I flick through the websites of a few high street shops. They’re nice but
when I see them I think “Is that it?” It’s all very much the same and if you
asked me to describe them in an hour or two I’d have forgotten.
Similarly, when I used to read magazines there would always
be articles about the bravery of wearing a colour that wasn’t black, white, grey,
navy or a pattern less basic than stripes. These fashion writers made it sound
like they were preparing you for a skydive, a marathon, or an exam.
Where’s the fun in that? Their grandmothers wore these wonderful novelty prints and
loved them enough to keep them so I could wear them today.
Rescuing Old Clothes:
Almost all of my vintage dresses were handmade and all have
hand stitched buttons and hems. There’s a lot of attention to detail in the pattern
matching, piping, and stitching you don’t really see in modern high street
clothes in the same price range.
However, due to their age almost all of my vintage dresses
have needed some sewing done to them. This could be going over the seams with
my sewing machine because 60 year old thread disintegrates much faster than the
fabric, securing or replacing buttons or a large restoration project involving intricate
patching. I love rescuing dresses others don’t see any way of fixing. I love
making them strong enough to last another 60 years. I love proving others wrong
when they can’t see what I’d do with “that old shabby dress”.
Does this mean wearing vintage is better for the environment?
Generally, yes because making a new dress involves new resources. However, I do
note my cotton 1950s dresses require more ironing and fill up a washing machine
faster than your average modern wardrobe.
Having unique bright, well made and rescued dresses makes me
happy. Working and travelling to work takes 60 hours a week but I can enjoy
wearing a great outfit the same time.
A side effect is it seems to make other
people happy too. Strangers often stop me to say I look great and that I've brightened their day. I’ve been street
style snapped and made new friends. The best thing, however, is when someone is inspired to wear something different, brighter, and quirkier than their
usual. It’s having one of the few women in senior roles in your
office and who you admire say you’ve inspired them to find themselves one
bright dress and live it up with it. It’s going on a course and finding out the
trainer loves vintage and wants her mother’s clothes to go to a good home and is
offering them to you. It’s being told by people on your street
and at your regular haunts they can’t wait to see what you’ll wear
next because it cheers them up
Bring Your Dress to Work Day:
One thing that always struck me as both amusing and poignant
is while my dresses are 60-70 years old, a lot probably haven’t seen an office
until they met me. They’re living a reverse retirement!
I adore midcentury clothes and some of the furniture, but I’d
personally never deck my house out like it was the 1950s or try to live a 1950s
lifestyle. I’ve always found events which try to re-enact the 1940s and 1950s
unsettling. After all, it’s highly unlikely I could be what I am today – a young,
non-white female in charge of an analytical team – back then.
I’m lucky to be able to wear what I’d normally wear at a
weekend to work (except for the hats) and it’s nice to subvert the original
purposes of many of these dresses.
***
So there you have it, folks. I fully admit real midcentury
vintage isn’t for everyone. A dress can be anywhere between £20 if you’re lucky
and/or it needs repairs and an expensive £100 for a rare and perfect condition
novelty print. You need the skills and patience to repair your finds, time to visit
vintage shops, and eBay luck. You need to enjoy the look, the colours and the
prints. You need to be undaunted by people looking and commenting on what you're wearing. Above all, you need to feel
the clothes are comfortable and well suited to you and your lifestyle because
that’s what will make you happy!
I loved reading this! And I didn't realise shoes were narrower and gloves smaller from the 50s, I will have to be more adventurous in my shopping :)
ReplyDeleteThanks Emma. Your comment cheered me up this morning.
DeleteNot only were shoes narrower, I find the shape of them more sturdy and supportive than modern equivalents in almost exactly the same style.
It's rare to find a pair in very good condition though. Most I've seen have been well patched by a cobbler and well worn. Not surprising since they were made to last and relatively expensive.
Those red ones were made during WWII as they have the "CC41" stamp on them. They say "debuntante" inside so I guess they were worn only once or twice to a prom like event. Or maybe their owner didn't survive to wear them more...who knows!
I have a pair of 1950s shoes made for the "New Look" I bought on ebay for £20. They're lovely but needed a lot of cleaning and brushing off the glue residue which had turned to dust over the years. In the end I took some parts of the shoes apart to dust out the glue dust and glued it all back together. A post for another time!
Gloves are pretty easy to find though. I can keep a look out for you if you let me know what style and size you're looking for. This blog here has a good post about sizing and what the vintage sizes mean.
http://www.chronicallyvintage.com/2012/10/how-to-size-vintage-gloves.html
Forgot to hit "notify me" so just saw this! I would love more gloves but it is never cold enough to wear my current pair here so it would be a bit indulgent at the moment. Perhaps if we move back to the UK again some day :) My current pair were from the department shop where I worked while at uni, and there were SO MANY sizes. They were made in Italy and are beautiful and soft. But alas only in black. I remember I wanted another pair when I lived in the UK and was shocked at how most stores just had "small, med, large" for all of their gloves, and the small was very big!
Delete